Patent & IP news for June 26, 2010

Patent Litigations

  • No new litigations this day!

USPTO Stats

8,364
published
appl'ns
4,163
granted
patents
104
ptab
decisions

Patent & IP Blogs

post image Amici challenge pharma pay-for-delay from patlit.blogspot.com


Readers may recall our earlier report that, in April, a Second Circuit panel grudgingly ruled for Bayer and Barr pharmaceutical companies in In re Ciprofloxacin Hydrochloride Antitrust Litigation. Bound by Tamoxifen, the panel determined that ...

Share via E–mail | Twitter | Facebook

No Decision On WIPO Treaty For Blind Persons Misses ‘Golden Opportunity’ from www.ip-watch.org

Member states at the World Intellectual Property Organization late Thursday night were unable to reach agreement on a draft chair’s conclusions text summarising a four-day WIPO copyright committee meeting, crashing the prospect of swift ...

Share via E–mail | Twitter | Facebook

(Copy)Righting a Bollywood Wrong from spicyipindia.blogspot.com


We'd blogged earlier on the government move to amend the copyright act to inter-alia redress a historical injustice and compensate Bollywood artists more justly for their creative endeavours.

As many of you may be ...

Share via E–mail | Twitter | Facebook

Scope Of Anti-Counterfeiting Agreement Again A Big Issue In Round Nine from www.ip-watch.org

MUNICH - The staid little Swiss town of Lucerne this week sees round number nine of the negotiations for the Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA). While the 11 negotiating parties gather in the Palace Hotel, the Swiss ...

Share via E–mail | Twitter | Facebook

.xxx Domain Appears Headed For Internet from www.ip-watch.org

A .xxx domain may finally go to the internet root after years of debate. The Board of the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) in their official meeting yesterday decided to restart negotations ...

Share via E–mail | Twitter | Facebook

Bilski: from Lemley to Mullin to the internet from ipbiz.blogspot.com

Joe Mullin writes of the Supreme Court on Bilski:

Whichever side Stevens is on, the long delay likely means there is disagreement among the justices, says Stanford Law professor Mark Lemley.

"If it was 9-0 ...

Share via E–mail | Twitter | Facebook

Some content © 2007–2014 RPX Corporation.
Terms of Service & Privacy Policy
For DMCA requests contact help@priorsmart.com.