BREAKING NEWS: Pinckney judgment just released from ipkitten.blogspot.com They certainly have pink knees,
but they are not Pinckney IPKat readers who follow all things copyright will remember Case C-170/12 Pinckney, an exciting reference from the French Court of Cassation concerning jurisdiction in ... Share via E–mail | Twitter | Facebook
Software inventions are patentable depending on how you claim it from ocpatentlawyer.com Software inventions are patentable depending on how you claim it The eligibility of patent protection for software patents is the hot topic in patent law. For now, the attack on patents hasn’t spilled over ...
Share via E–mail | Twitter | Facebook
Sanctions loom large: Samsung execs were told all terms of secret Nokia-Apple patent license from www.fosspatents.com Three months ago I saw a filing by Nokia that related to some discussions with Samsung considered so secretive that it wanted even the very title of a document to be sealed. It was clear ...
Share via E–mail | Twitter | Facebook
Federal Circuit Vacates PTAB Decision Invalidating Rambus Patent from www.pharmapatentsblog.com In Rambus, Inc. v. Rea, the Federal Circuit found several legal and procedural errors in the decision of the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) that invalidated certain claims of the Rambus patent as ...
Share via E–mail | Twitter | Facebook
GPhA Opposes California Biosimilar Bill; Points to Report on Savings from Biosimilars from www.patentdocs.org By Donald Zuhn -- Last week, the Generic Pharmaceutical Association (GPhA) released a statement regarding a California bill (SB-598) that the GPhA asserted would "introduce[] burdensome provisions that could raise costs and limit patient access to ...
Share via E–mail | Twitter | Facebook
Federal Circuit Vacates PTAB Decision Invalidating Rambus Patent from www.pharmapatentsblog.com In Rambus, Inc. v. Rea, the Federal Circuit found several legal and procedural errors in the decision of the USPTO Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) that invalidated certain claims of the Rambus patent as ...
Share via E–mail | Twitter | Facebook
ANDA Product Controls Infringement Analysis In Hatch-Waxman Framework from www.iplawalert.com Last week, the Federal Circuit, in Sunovion Pharm. v. Teva Pharm. USA, et al., addressed the appropriate infringement analysis in the context of Hatch-Waxman (aka “ANDA”) litigation. It held:
Although no traditional patent infringement [occurs ...
Share via E–mail | Twitter | Facebook
Government Shutdown Prompts Sua Sponte Stay from docketreport.blogspot.com The court sua sponte stayed four related cases due to a government shutdown. "[I]n light of the recent lapse in appropriation for the Federal Trade Commission, and given the fact that the FTC is ...
Share via E–mail | Twitter | Facebook
In LED Greenwashing Case Court Unplugs Lights of America from www.greenpatentblog.com A previous post discussed an action brought by the U.S. Federal Trade Commission (FTC) against Lights of America (LOA), charging the California LED lamp maker of violating the FTC Act by making false or ...
Share via E–mail | Twitter | Facebook
Composing Consent: Federal Court Dismisses Pinto v BJEC from www.iposgoode.ca The Federal Court recently held that in the absence of a written agreement, a copyright holder could grant implied consent to the use of their work when they allowed the work to be used for ...
Share via E–mail | Twitter | Facebook
What is an Exceptional Case such that Court Should Award Attorney Fees? from www.patentlyo.com By Dennis Crouch Earlier this week, I commented on the two attorney-fees cases pending before the US Supreme Court: Octane Fitness, LLC v. ICON Health & Fitness, Inc., Docket No. 12-1184; and Highmark Inc. v. Allcare ...
Share via E–mail | Twitter | Facebook
At CAFC, Microsoft gets reversal of ITC decision as to US '133: "Unavoidable proximity is still proximity." from ipbiz.blogspot.com In
Microsoft v. ITC (Motorola), the CAFC noted
As to the claims of the ’133 patent that are at issue, however, we hold that the Commission relied on incorrect claim constructions in finding no infringement ... Share via E–mail | Twitter | Facebook
Federal judge determines 19 WiFi patents are worth a FRAND rate of less than 10 cents per unit from www.fosspatents.com A redacted version of the second U.S. FRAND royalty determination has just been published today. Judge James L. Robart in Seattle (Western District of Washington) pioneered this field with his 207-page rate-setting opinion in ...
Share via E–mail | Twitter | Facebook
Tecsec v. IBM; CAFC discusses scope of mandate within Rule 36 context; IBM's comments in oral argument: no “need to get to claim construction.” from ipbiz.blogspot.com In
Tecsec v. IBM, the CAFC noted of the mandate rule
The defendants argue that the mandate rule applies because: (1) the district court’s constructions were within the scope of its judgment; (2) that ... Share via E–mail | Twitter | Facebook
Intellectual Property Rights: study indicates that roughly 35% of jobs in the EU rely on IPR-intensive industries from www.iposgoode.ca The re-posting of this analysis is part of a cross-posting collaboration with MediaLaws: Law and Policy of the Media in a Comparative Perspective. The European Commission today welcomed the publication of a study on Intellectual ...
Share via E–mail | Twitter | Facebook
Few People Download Illegally, But Those That Do, Do It A Lot from www.iposgoode.ca The few, the mighty. That’s one way to describe illegal downloading habits. Ofcom, the United Kingdom (UK) communications regulator, has released topical data on digital downloads that violate copyright regulation. This study, based on ...
Share via E–mail | Twitter | Facebook
Patent Law Federalism (Part II): Protecting the Free Speech Interest of Patent Owners to Conduct an Out-of-Court Patent Enforcement Campaign from www.patentlyo.com Activision TV v. Pinnacle Bancorp (D.Neb 2013) In a second opinion in as many weeks, Federal Judge Bataillon (D.Neb.) has again ruled against the Nebraska State Attorney General and the state's campaign ...
Share via E–mail | Twitter | Facebook
PTAB Declines to Institute Inter Partes Review of Alimta (Pemetrexed) Patent from www.orangebookblog.com Accord Healthcare v. Eli Lilly and Co., IPR2013-00356 (PTAB) by Herbert D. Hart III On October 1, 2013, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board issued a decision denying the petition for inter partes review filed ...
Share via E–mail | Twitter | Facebook
ALJ Essex Denies-In-Part Motion To Compel In Certain Wireless Communications Base Stations (337-TA-871) from www.itcblog.com On September 30, 2013, ALJ Theodore R. Essex issued the public version of Order No. 13 (dated September 4, 2013) denying-in-part Respondents Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson and Ericsson Inc.’s (collectively, “Ericsson”) motion to compel Complainant ...
Share via E–mail | Twitter | Facebook
California Biosimilar Bill Aligns with BIO Principles on Biologic Substitution from www.patentdocs.org By Donald Zuhn -- Yesterday, we noted that the Generic Pharmaceutical Association (GPhA) recently expressed its opposition to a California bill (SB-598) that would authorize a pharmacist to select a biosimilar when filling a prescription order ...
Share via E–mail | Twitter | Facebook