Dissenting over Internal Procedures at the Federal Circuit from patentlyo.com Normally, a denial of a petition for rehearing and rehearing en banc would be a non-event. As Hal Wegner pointed out in his email newsletter, however, Judge Plager’s dissent from the rehearing in Middleton ...
Share via E–mail | Twitter | Facebook
"Subtle but insidious" transfer from pheasant to pigeon cooks Fraser's goose from ipkitten.blogspot.com For once, there are no jokes about Bird & Bird, but the Chancery Division of the High Court, England and Wales, ruling in
Jack Wills Ltd v House of Fraser (Stores) Ltd [2014] EWHC 110 (Ch ... Share via E–mail | Twitter | Facebook
Vringo’s Potential $1b in Google-AOL Patent Case is not Yet a Win from ipcloseup.wordpress.com While the court’s decision to enhance damages last week is a big positive, Google is unlikely to accept defeat without a fight. Vringo, Inc.’s shares shot up 20% last Wednesday after a district ...
Share via E–mail | Twitter | Facebook
Homemade solutions against patent trolls - part 2: New York Advocate General reaches settlement with MPHJ from patlit.blogspot.com In July 2013, the Nebraska Attorney General chose a peculiar solution to prevent the spread of 'patent trolling' phenomena. Rather than directly targeting the patent holder, the AG filed a
cease and desist order against ...
Share via E–mail | Twitter | Facebook
Copyright: too much, too easy -- so don't protect? from ipkitten.blogspot.com Here's a bit of mischief for a Monday evening. Occasional guest blogger Sean Gilday (a trainee patent attorney at Page Hargrave) has been having thoughts about setting copyright free and Merpel thought it might ... Share via E–mail | Twitter | Facebook
Monday miscellany from ipkitten.blogspot.com Ever sensitive to cultural niceties, the EPO
always prefers the three-language solutionThought for the day. Following last week's Friday Fantasies item on the forthcoming European Patent Office event, "Search Matters 2014", an anonymous ... Share via E–mail | Twitter | Facebook
IPO Webinar on Appeals from the PTAB from www.patentdocs.org The Intellectual Property Owners Association (IPO) will offer a one-hour webinar entitled "Appeals from the PTAB: Laying the Groundwork for the Federal Circuit" on February 6, 2014 beginning at 2:00 pm (ET). A panel ...
Share via E–mail | Twitter | Facebook
Conference & CLE Calendar from www.patentdocs.org February 6, 2014 - "Appeals from the PTAB: Laying the Groundwork for the Federal Circuit" (Intellectual Property Owners Association) - 2:00 to 3:00 pm (ET) February 13, 2014 - "Proactive Patent Procurement and Prosecution Strategies: Minimizing ...
Share via E–mail | Twitter | Facebook
Court Report from www.patentdocs.org By Sherri Oslick -- About Court Report: Each week we will report briefly on recently filed biotech and pharma cases. Eli Lilly and Company v. Glenmark Generics Inc., USA 1:14-cv-00104; filed January 23, 2013 in ...
Share via E–mail | Twitter | Facebook
Samsung concerned about resellers' fear and uncertainty in case Apple wins an injunction from www.fosspatents.com On Thursday (January 30), Judge Lucy Koh (Northern District of California) held a hearing on Apple and Samsung's post-trial motions following the recent limited damages retrial and, which was the more important item on ...
Share via E–mail | Twitter | Facebook
WIPO Issues Tribute To Pete Seeger from www.ip-watch.org The World Intellectual Property Organization has posted a tribute to legendary American folk singer, songwriter and activist Pete Seeger, who died on 27 January at the age of 94.
Related Articles: Share via E–mail | Twitter | Facebook
Warranty of Non-Infringement from patentlyo.com In Bowman v. Monsanto, 133 S.Ct. 1761 (2013), the Supreme Court found that soybean farmer Vernon Bowman could be held liable for infringing the Monsanto GM seed patents. Bowman had purchased the seed from ...
Share via E–mail | Twitter | Facebook
PTAB Not Bound by District Court Judgment of No Invalidity from docketreport.blogspot.com In a final written decision, the Board rejected the patent owner's argument that
res judicata or collateral estoppel barred the Board from determining that the challenged claims were unpatentable under §101 in light of ...
Share via E–mail | Twitter | Facebook
IP Intensive Program: Taking a Look Behind the Wizard’s Curtain – A Semester at the Canadian Intellectual Property Office from www.iposgoode.ca Off in the far-away land of our nation’s capital (actually, across the river in Gatineau, Quebec, to be specific) exists a mystical place. A building where applications are examined, rights are granted, and hearings ...
Share via E–mail | Twitter | Facebook
ITC staff thinks Apple is not nearly as close to a U.S. import ban of Motorola's devices as it argues from www.fosspatents.com Approximately three months ago the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit denied Google's Motorola Mobility a rehearing and subsequently remanded to the United States International Trade Commission (USITC, or just ITC ...
Share via E–mail | Twitter | Facebook
“Meringue” is not an Ingredient in Lemon Meringue Pie: Defining “Identical Medicinal Ingredient” from www.iposgoode.ca What do cooking and chemistry have in common? Apparently, the former provides great analogies to explain the latter. Apotex has recently applied for judicial review of a decision of the Director General of the Therapeutic ...
Share via E–mail | Twitter | Facebook
“No Patents On Seeds” Serves EPO Patent Objection And Free Pepper Soup from www.ip-watch.org 32 farmer, breeder and environmental organisations from 26 countries gathered by the “no-patents-on-seeds” alliance today filed an opposition against a patent on an insect-resistant sweet pepper at the European Patent Office in Munich.
Related Articles ... Share via E–mail | Twitter | Facebook
African Union Backs WIPO DG Candidate Geoffrey Onyeama from www.ip-watch.org The 54-member African Union last week declared its support for Geoffrey Onyeama as a candidate for director general of the World Intellectual Property Organization.
Related Articles: Share via E–mail | Twitter | Facebook
Earlier priority date given with passing reference in patent application from ocpatentlawyer.com Earlier priority date given with passing reference in patent application For important or keystone inventions, the initial patent application may expand to a number of further continuing applications (i.e., continuation, divisional and continuation-in-part applications ...
Share via E–mail | Twitter | Facebook
WIPO Director General Election: How It Works from www.ip-watch.org On 6 March, the United Nations World Intellectual Property Organization will hold its once-every-six-year election for a director general, a prized post in the multilateral system. Tomorrow (4 February), the candidates will face member states ...
Share via E–mail | Twitter | Facebook
Federal Circuit: The Term Receiver (found once in the specification) Sufficiently Discloses the Claimed Receiver and Receiver Means from patentlyo.com By Dennis Crouch EnOcean v. Face Int’l. (Fed. Cir. 2014) This interference appeal is focused on interpreting the “functional” claim term “receiver” and relates directly to recent Patently-O discussions on the topic of means-plus-function ...
Share via E–mail | Twitter | Facebook
MVS Filewrapper® Blog: Patent Invalidity Based on Non-Compliant Claims of Priority from www.filewrapper.com In Medtronic Corevalve, LLC v. Edwards Lifesciences Corp., the Federal Circuit affirmed summary judgment of invalidity of the asserted claims of U.S. Patent No. 7,892,281 ("the '281 patent") based on the patent ...
Share via E–mail | Twitter | Facebook
ALJ Shaw Issues Notice Of Initial Determination In Certain Compact Fluorescent Reflector Lamps (337-TA-872) from www.itcblog.com On February 3, 2014, ALJ David P. Shaw issued a notice of the Final Initial Determination (“ID”) in Certain Compact Fluorescent Reflector Lamps, Products Containing Same and Components Thereof (Inv. No. 337-TA-872). By way of ...
Share via E–mail | Twitter | Facebook
Board says newly cited reference is not a new ground of rejection since it's a CIP of previously used reference from allthingspros.blogspot.com Takeaway: The Applicant appealed an obviousness rejection based on three references, and argued that the primary reference Huang did not teach an element as asserted by the Examiner. The Examiner's Answer "further submitted" another ...
Share via E–mail | Twitter | Facebook