US Supreme Court "Definitely" At It Again from ipkitten.blogspot.com Yesterday was a patent double bill from the US Supreme Court. As our dear blogmeister Jeremy
has just posted, it was confirmed that for there to be inducement of infringement, there has to be a ...
Share via E–mail | Twitter | Facebook
US Supreme Court in the Limelight, casts shadow over patent inducement liability from ipkitten.blogspot.com Forget for a minute topics as such quality patents, mechanisms for examination and grant, patent prosecution highways and all that stuff: it's the quality of relief for patent infringement which is the motor that ...
Share via E–mail | Twitter | Facebook
Danes vote to ratify the Unified Patent Court agreement from patlit.blogspot.com But 5-0 is not enough ...Via a European Commission
media release comes news that the Danes have voted in a referendum in favour of joining the Unified Patent Court (UPC). This decision empowers the Danish ...
Share via E–mail | Twitter | Facebook
Limelight Networks, Inc. v. Akamai Technologies, Inc. (2014) from www.patentdocs.org By Donald Zuhn -- Today, in Limelight Networks, Inc. v. Akamai Technologies, Inc., the Supreme Court determined that a defendant is not liable for inducing infringement of a patent under 35 U. S. C. § 271(b ...
Share via E–mail | Twitter | Facebook
Industry group presents another theory for slashing Apple's $929 million award in Samsung case from www.fosspatents.com A few days ago I blogged about an amicus curiae brief submitted by 27 law professors in support of Samsung's appeal of the $929 million aggregate damages award in the first California Apple v ...
Share via E–mail | Twitter | Facebook
Innovation Occurs In Informal Economy, Needs Policy Framework, Panellists Say from www.ip-watch.org Findings of a World Intellectual Property Organization Committee on Development and Intellectual Property (CDIP) project show that innovation occurs in the informal sector, and generates employment and development. Panellists at a recent side event to ...
Share via E–mail | Twitter | Facebook
No Patent Office Director – 486 Days Later from patentlyo.com By Dennis Crouch David Kappos has been an instrumental leader in patent reform over the past several years. In the lead-up to the America Invents Act of 2011, it was Kappos – acting then in his ...
Share via E–mail | Twitter | Facebook
Supreme Court reverts to stricter standard for finding induced patent infringement from ipspotlight.com Continuing its string of reversals of Federal Circuit patent decisions, the United States Supreme Court has done it again. In Limelight Technologies, Inc. v. Akamai Technologies, Inc., the Court ruled that a defendant can be ...
Share via E–mail | Twitter | Facebook
Patent Reform 2014: Removing Non-Practicing Entities from the USITC’s Jurisdiction from patentlyo.com This is a Guest Post from attorney Ben Snitkoff who originally posted it on the blog Technically Legal. Technically Legal is a blog and podcast run by three technology-focused lawyers and their technology expert: David ...
Share via E–mail | Twitter | Facebook
Is the Federal Circuit Really Worse Than the Cubs? from patentlyo.com By Jason Rantanen Yesterday, following the Supreme Court’s unanimous reversal of the Federal Circuit in Nautilus and Akamai, Vera Ranieri of the Electronic Frontier Foundation observed that: These rulings mean that the Federal Circuit ...
Share via E–mail | Twitter | Facebook
Judicial Error and Justice Alito’s Hypothetical in Limelight from patentlyo.com By Jason Rantanen As I read yesterday’s two Supreme Court opinions, I was struck by the sense that even as it grants certiorari on an extraordinary number of patent cases, the Court’s actual ...
Share via E–mail | Twitter | Facebook
A look at a new book on Creating a Learning Society from www.athenaalliance.org It is hard to tell whether "Pikettymania" (including the little dust up over data) has peaked now that he has been on the Colbert Report (see my earlier post on the best reviews of his ...
Share via E–mail | Twitter | Facebook
ITC Institutes Investigation (337-TA-916) Regarding Certain Non-Volatile Memory Chips from www.itcblog.com On May 29, 2014, the U.S. International Trade Commission issued a press release announcing their vote to institute an investigation of Certain Non-Volatile Memory Chips and Products Containing the Same (Inv. No. 337-TA-916). The ...
Share via E–mail | Twitter | Facebook
MVS Filewrapper® Blog: Supreme Court Holds Induced Infringement Requires Direct Infringement from www.filewrapper.com This week the U.S. Supreme Court issued its decision in Limelight Networks, Inc. v. Akamai Technologies, concluding that an act of direct patent infringement must be present for a claim of inducement of infringement ...
Share via E–mail | Twitter | Facebook
ALJ Pender Sets Date For Markman Hearing In Certain Earpiece Devices Having Positioning And Retaining Structure (337-TA-912) from www.itcblog.com On May 30, 2014, ALJ Thomas B. Pender issued Order No. 5 in Certain Earpiece Devices Having Positioning And Retaining Structure and Components Thereof (Inv. No. 337-TA-912). By way of background, the investigation is based ...
Share via E–mail | Twitter | Facebook