Patent & IP news for June 19, 2014

Patent Litigations

USPTO Stats

8,547
published
appl'ns
4,904
granted
patents
64
ptab
decisions

Patent & IP Blogs

post image Redskins' Cancellation of Disparaging Trademark Interview from patentlawip.blogspot.com

As a follow up to yesterday’s blogpost regarding the landmark decision by the TTAB to cancel the Redskins’ trademarks, I did an interview on KFI 640 AM with Bryan Suits.  Enjoy!


http://www.stationcaster ...

Share via E–mail | Twitter | Facebook

post image The Cat's Pyjamas: Louis Vuitton saves much of its 3D lock trade mark from ipkitten.blogspot.com

Going through his file of items to blog which have fallen behind in his priority list, this Kat has just rediscovered another decision that troubled him when he first spotted it -- not because it was ...

Share via E–mail | Twitter | Facebook

post image Redskins, rebrands -- and reasons from ipkitten.blogspot.com

Like a quiverful of arrows striking their target, emails from almost every corner of the civilized world have been thudding into this Kat's email box to tell him all about the Washington Redskins' REDSKINS ...

Share via E–mail | Twitter | Facebook

post image Seeing very red....? CJEU decides in Oberbank colour trade mark dispute from ipkitten.blogspot.com

HSK 13 in all its glory
(registered as a pure colour mark
-- without any word or device elements) The CJEU has today handed down its decision in cases C-217/13 & C-218/13 OBERBANK AND OTHERS ...

Share via E–mail | Twitter | Facebook

post image Copyright candies ... from the publishing world from ipkitten.blogspot.com

Can you call it a holiday
if you don't have
at least a White Paper
to read while sunbathing?
Publishers I   Do you remember the Public Consultation on the Review of EU Copyright Rules ...

Share via E–mail | Twitter | Facebook

post image Is it Safe? Judgment from the CJEU in Bayer CropScience SPC from ipkitten.blogspot.com

IsoxadifenThe CJEU today handed down its decision in Case C‑11/13, Bayer CropScience AG, concerning whether a safener can be the subject of a Supplementary Protection Certificate. This moggy was delighted that, unlike the ...

Share via E–mail | Twitter | Facebook

New from Abroad: Double Patenting at the EPO -- What Does "Same Subject Matter" Mean? from www.patentdocs.org

Although the EPC does not specifically prohibit double patenting, that is the grant of two patents to the same applicant for the same invention, it is generally accepted that two patents cannot be granted to ...

Share via E–mail | Twitter | Facebook

The USPTO on the Redskins: cancellation 92046185 from ipbiz.blogspot.com

The decision authored by Judge Kuhlke noted the prior cancellation by the Board, which was reversed by the D. D.C., 284 F. Supp. 2d 96; 68 USPQ2d 1225 (2003). An appeal of that decision ...

Share via E–mail | Twitter | Facebook

Washington Redskins Trademark Registrations are Cancelled from anticipatethis.wordpress.com

Today the United States Patent and Trademark Office cancelled six of the Washington Redskins’ trademarks, all of which involved the term “redskins.”  The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) concluded that “Redskins” was disparaging of ...

Share via E–mail | Twitter | Facebook

Supreme Court’s New Indefiniteness Standard Does Not Require Reconsideration Of Claim Construction from docketreport.blogspot.com

The court denied plaintiffs' motion for supplemental claim construction following Nautilus, Inc. v. BioSig Instruments, Inc., 572 U.S. ___, No. 13-369, slip op. (June 2, 2014) addressing indefiniteness. "Plaintiffs are correct that the Supreme ...

Share via E–mail | Twitter | Facebook

Alice v. CLS Bank: Claims Invalid Under Section 101 from patentlyo.com

By Jason Rantanen Alice Corporation Pty. Ltd. v. CLS Bank International (2014) Download opinion here: Alice v CLS This morning the Supreme Court issued its opinion in Alice, unanimously finding all claims invalid under Section ...

Share via E–mail | Twitter | Facebook

Board reverse obvious equivalence specification from allthingspros.blogspot.com

Board reverses obviousness when Examiner relies on Applicant's specification for equivalence of bidirectional fabric and metal plates disclosed in reference

Takeaway: The Examiner used the substitution rationale in an obviousness rejection, and relied on ...

Share via E–mail | Twitter | Facebook

Law, technology development and learning - the case of Silicon Valley from www.athenaalliance.org

All too often we view innovation and technology development as Athena-like -- springing from the head of Zeus (in this case the inventor/engineer/entrepreneur). However, scholars (such as Nobel-laureate Douglas North) remind us that economic ...

Share via E–mail | Twitter | Facebook

Supreme Court ruling in CLS Bank v. Alice makes 'generic' the new magic word for software patents from www.fosspatents.com

The Supreme Court of the United States just handed down its opinion in Alice v. CLS Bank, a case that some people (including the appellant) misportrayed as a case that was fundamentally about whether or ...

Share via E–mail | Twitter | Facebook

MVS Filewrapper® Blog: USPTO Cancels Washington, D.C. NFL Franchise's Trademark Registrations from www.filewrapper.com

The United States Patent and Trademark Office issued a decision yesterday cancelling six federal trademark registrations owned by the Washington, D.C. National Football League franchise.  The cancellation proceeding was brought by five Native American ...

Share via E–mail | Twitter | Facebook

Supreme Court Issues Decision in Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank from www.patentdocs.org

Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank International (2014) By Kevin E. Noonan -- This morning, in Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank, the Supreme affirmed the Federal Circuit's per curiam opinion in CLS Bank v. Alice Corp ...

Share via E–mail | Twitter | Facebook

Guest Post by Prof. McKenna: The Implications of Blackhorse v. Pro-Football, Inc. from patentlyo.com

Professor Mark P. McKenna of The University of Notre Dame Law School is one of the leading scholars of trademark law.  Below, he provides his thoughts on the legal consequences of the TTAB’s decision ...

Share via E–mail | Twitter | Facebook

Supreme Court on Patentable Subject Matter from inventivestep.net

The Supreme Court issued its opinion in Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank Int’l.  Unfortunately, the Court did not heed Chief Judge Rader’s admonition to “consult the statute” in holding that all claims are ...

Share via E–mail | Twitter | Facebook

U.S. Supreme Court Decides Alice v. CLS Bank: Computer Patents Ineligible Unless Claims Recite Non-Conventional “Inventive Concepts” from patlit.blogspot.com

[This post was written by David, and posted by Stefano on his behalf]
This morning, a unanimous U.S. Supreme Court ruled that claims directed to computer-implemented methods and related systems are not eligible for ...

Share via E–mail | Twitter | Facebook

Alice is Not in Wonderland: Generic Computers and Abstract Ideas Don’t Mix from www.iplawalert.com

District courts have been abuzz with accused infringers asserting invalidity based on ineligible subject matter under section 101. This is a result of evolving jurisprudence developed by the Federal Circuit and Supreme Court over the ...

Share via E–mail | Twitter | Facebook

Supreme Court delivers blow to “abstract” software patents, while stating that software still can be patent-eligible from ipspotlight.com

In an opinion long-awaited by the software community, the U.S. Supreme Court has found a computer-implemented method and system for exchanging financial obligations to ineligible for patenting. In Alice Corporation Pty Ltd. v. CLS ...

Share via E–mail | Twitter | Facebook

In Defense of IPR: The Timing of the Tesla Move will Diminish The Company’s Value from www.greenpatentblog.com

Guest post by Philip Totaro, Founder & CEO of Totaro & Associates   In the early stage of an industry, the long term may seem like it’s too far away.  Penetration of electric vehicles (EVs) has not ...

Share via E–mail | Twitter | Facebook

USPTO TTAB cancels Redskins Trademark from www.lotempiolaw.com

On Wednesday, June 18, the United States Patent and Trademark Office’s Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) issued a ruling that canceled the federal registration of six trademarks related to the Washington Redskins of ...

Share via E–mail | Twitter | Facebook

No Autocorrect for Apple and Samsung in their Patent Wars from www.iposgoode.ca

The seemingly never ending saga between Apple and Samsung that began in 2011 has seen another day (month) in court. On the surface this may seem like another sweeping victory for Apple, but the war ...

Share via E–mail | Twitter | Facebook

US High Court Shuts Door On Many Software Patents from www.ip-watch.org

Software patents have become a major problem in the United States. These patents are often so vague and broad, they are hindering innovation and economic growth, according to many businesses, economists, and patent experts. But ...

Share via E–mail | Twitter | Facebook

Thoughts on Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank Int'l from www.patentdocs.org

By Michael Borella -- There's an old saying that "bad facts make bad law," acknowledging that a court's decision regarding an extreme case can result in law that poorly serves less extreme cases. The ...

Share via E–mail | Twitter | Facebook

Some content © 2007–2014 RPX Corporation.
Terms of Service & Privacy Policy
For DMCA requests contact help@priorsmart.com.