Patent & IP news for July 29, 2014
Patent Litigations
- Enteris Biopharma, Inc. v. Clinical Pharmacology of Miami, Inc. filed 2014-07-28 in Florida Southern
- Enteris Biopharma, Inc., as Successor In Interest to Unigene Laboratories, Inc. v. Clinical Pharmacology of Miami, Inc. filed 2014-07-28 in Florida Southern
- Novartis Pharmaceutical Corporation et. al. v. Breckenridge Pharmaceutical, Inc. filed 2014-07-28 in Florida Southern
- JST Performance Incorporated et. al. v. Sun Auto Electronics LLC et. al. filed 2014-07-28 in Arizona
- Taro Pharmaceuticals USA Inc. et. al. v. Perrigo Israel Pharmaceuticals Ltd. filed 2014-07-28 in Delaware
- Warner Chilcott Company LLC et. al. v. Aurobindo Pharma Ltd. et. al. filed 2014-07-28 in Delaware
- Cherdak v. Motorola Mobility, LLC filed 2014-07-23 in Virginia Eastern
- Skipprint, LLC v. Japs-Olson Company filed 2014-07-29 in Minnesota
- Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation et. al. v. Breckenridge Pharmaceutical, Inc. filed 2014-07-25 in New York Southern
- CpuMate Inc. v. Sony Corporation et. al. filed 2014-07-28 in California Northern
- v. CDR Printing LLC et. al. filed 2014-07-29 in Texas Eastern
- CDR Printing LLC v. Fedex Office and Print Services, Inc. filed 2014-07-29 in Texas Eastern
- Beneficial Innovations, Inc. v. Microsoft Corporation filed 2014-07-29 in Texas Eastern
- C Y Wong Intellectual Property LLC v. Bulova Watch Company, Inc. filed 2014-07-29 in Texas Eastern
- NetJumper Software, LLC v. deviantART filed 2014-07-29 in California Central
- Oakley, Inc. v. Stampede Presentation Products, Inc. et. al. filed 2014-07-29 in California Southern
- SkipPrint v. Quad/Graphics filed 2014-07-29 in Wisconsin Eastern
- Cheng et. al. v. Lowe's Home Centers, LLC et. al. filed 2014-07-29 in California Central
USPTO Stats
6,596
published
appl'ns
appl'ns
4,999
granted
patents
patents
64
ptab
decisions
decisions
Patent & IP Blogs
The heart of the matter: one patent, two views from ipkitten.blogspot.com This guest blogpost comes courtesy of Katfriend and occasional contributor Suleman Ali (Holly IP), a patent attorney whose interest lies mainly in the biotech and medical fields --an interest that is quite germane to the ...
Kanye West Ain’t No (Crypto) Banker from ipkitten.blogspot.com His Account is Not Likely OverdrawnOne of the defendants in the ‘Coinye West’ trademark infringement suit entered into a consent agreement with Kanye West and his company Mascotte Holdings (Plaintiffs) over the Coinye West crypto-currency ...
Everyone in the supply chain could be sued for patent infringement from ocpatentlawyer.com Patent owners can sue anyone up and down the chain of distribution for infringement of patent. Manufacturers, distributors and end users are all possible litigants. For example, the end user can be sued for using ...
Phew, what a scorcher: police apply Sunblock to red-hot fake sales websites from ipkitten.blogspot.com "Police placing anti-piracy warning ads on illegal sites", by Dave Lee, appears on the BBC website here. This piece reads, in relevant part, as follows:
"The City of London police has started placing banner advertisements ...
European Patent Reform: a high-power forum may be heading your way ... from ipkitten.blogspot.com MIP: food for thoughtWhile interest in the governance of Eponia (the eponymous Central European fiefdom of the European Patent Office) runs gratifyingly high, as the comments posted to Merpel's Sunday night blogpost testify ...
Finally, A Biosimilar Application Has Been Accepted By The FDA from www.patentdocs.org
By Andrew Williams -- In what is thought to be the first application accepted under the new biosimilar pathway created by the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation (BPCI) Act, Sandoz announced last Thursday that the U ...
By Andrew Williams -- In what is thought to be the first application accepted under the new biosimilar pathway created by the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation (BPCI) Act, Sandoz announced last Thursday that the U ...
Plaintiff’s Success in Related Litigation Undermines Defendant’s Attorneys’ Fee Request from docketreport.blogspot.com
Following summary judgment, the court denied defendant's motion for attorneys’ fees under 35 U.S.C. § 285. "Defendants argue that [plaintiff] knew or should have known that Court’s First Claim Construction Order was ...
Following summary judgment, the court denied defendant's motion for attorneys’ fees under 35 U.S.C. § 285. "Defendants argue that [plaintiff] knew or should have known that Court’s First Claim Construction Order was ...