She’s Got Bette Davis’…Trademark? from ipkitten.blogspot.com I found about this
case reading this
tweet from New York copyright and trademark lawyer Marty Schwimmer. A warm Kat Pat to Marty, thank you!
It has been only two months that I am guest-blogging ...
Share via E–mail | Twitter | Facebook
If a patent says something is “essential,” then it must be so from ipspotlight.com To help a patent attorney prepare a patent application, inventors often provide a copy of a manuscript for an upcoming technical journal, research publication or white paper. The manuscript often goes into great detail to ...
Share via E–mail | Twitter | Facebook
Blue Origin and SpaceX fighting at PTAB over Blue Origin's US 8,678,321 from ipbiz.blogspot.com In IPR2014-01376, SpaceX asserts, among other things, that there is anticipation of claims of Blue Origin's US '321: " Each limitation of claims 1, 2, and 3 is disclosed by Ishijima." [Yoshiyuki Ishijima et al ...
Share via E–mail | Twitter | Facebook
IP Osgoode: Call for Applications from www.iposgoode.ca We are pleased to announce a call for applications for a number of exciting opportunities with IP Osgoode including IPilogue Editors and IP Osgoode Innovation Clinic Fellows. See below for more information. Call for IPilogue ...
Share via E–mail | Twitter | Facebook
Guest Post: The Case Against Federalizing Trade Secrecy from patentlyo.com Guest post by Christopher B. Seaman, Assistant Professor of Law at Washington and Lee University School of Law. As Dennis recently discussed, the idea of creating a private cause of action for trade secret misappropriation ...
Share via E–mail | Twitter | Facebook
IP programs ranked by h-index and m-index from writtendescription.blogspot.com Everyone seems to love new rankings! Inspired by Dan Burk's lists of IP scholars by
h-index and
m-index,
Christopher Yoo (Penn Law) calculated cumulative
h-index and
m-index rankings by school ...
Share via E–mail | Twitter | Facebook
Allergan, Inc. v. Apotex, Inc. (Fed. Cir. 2014) from www.patentdocs.org By Michael Greenfield -- In a not particularly well-written opinion that breaks no new ground, the Federal Circuit considered a consolidated appeal of two patents directed to methods of promoting hair growth, including, in particular, eyelash ...
Share via E–mail | Twitter | Facebook