Toy marks under scrutiny: is there a rift between OHIM Appeal Boards? from ipkitten.blogspot.com What could be more appropriate, for a European Kat who is away in the Antipodes, than for him to post this guest item on Community trade mark law from a genuine Aussie who is now ... Share via E–mail | Twitter | Facebook
Toy marks under scrutiny: is there a rift between OHIM Appeal Boards? from ipkitten.blogspot.com What could be more appropriate, for a European Kat who is away in the Antipodes, than for him to post this guest item on Community trade mark law from a genuine Aussie who is now ... Share via E–mail | Twitter | Facebook
In re Cuozzo Speed Technologies LLC Federal Circuit Argument -- The Patent Office Asks to Have Its Cake and Eat It Too from www.patentdocs.org By Andrew Williams -- Last week, the Federal Circuit heard the first oral argument for the first appeal of an inter partes review ("IPR") final written decision for the first IPR ever filed (IPR2012-00001). The IPR ...
Share via E–mail | Twitter | Facebook
Congressional Oversight of the USPTO from patentlyo.com by Dennis Crouch With the America Invents Act of 2011 (AIA), Congress handed the USPTO a central role in implementing major legislative patent reforms. Those include both designing the structure and procedure for post-issuance review ...
Share via E–mail | Twitter | Facebook
Neither Baritsu Nor the Supreme Court Can Stop Sherlock Holmes from Falling Into the Public Domain from www.iplawalert.com We previously reported on the failed attempts by the Conan Doyle Estate, Ltd., to extend the umbrella of United States copyright protection for Sir Arthur Conan Doyle’s pre-1923 Sherlock Holmes-related works. After suffering a ...
Share via E–mail | Twitter | Facebook
China’s First Intellectual Property Court Makes Its Debut, Two More To Follow from www.ip-watch.org The following is a contributed summary of recent news in China from various sources. The Beijing Intellectual Property Court, China’s first specialised IP court, came into being on 6 November, for which a ceremony ...
Share via E–mail | Twitter | Facebook
Board swear behind 1.131 no explanation from allthingspros.blogspot.com Takeaway: The Applicant attempted to remove a reference with a § 1.131 (swear-behind) declaration. The two-page declaration referred to an Appendix A included in the provisional application but did not comment or explain on the ...
Share via E–mail | Twitter | Facebook
Intellectual Property: A Threat from Within from www.legalteamusa.net The most costly data breaches are usually those that are created by a malicious insider. These people normally have access to things external hackers generally don’t have access to, like intellectual...
.
Share via E–mail | Twitter | Facebook
USPTO vs Hyatt: When an Applicant has Too Many Patent Applications from patentlyo.com Hyatt v. USPTO, Case No. 14-1300 (E.D.Va. 2014) Earlier this year, Gilbert Hyatt sued the USPTO for unreasonably delaying examination of 80 of his pending patent applications — many of which have been pending ...
Share via E–mail | Twitter | Facebook
"Desperately seeking the Big Picture": live and on stream ... from ipkitten.blogspot.com Today (for those of you who are in Australia, at any rate) IPKat blogmeister Jeremy will be delivering this year's Francis Gurry Lecture on Intellectual Property -- the sixth in the series -- under the title ...
Share via E–mail | Twitter | Facebook