Sofa, so good? How to lose both your two trade marks and still come out on top ... from ipkitten.blogspot.com Sitting comfortably? The Sofa Workshop Ltd v Sofaworks Ltd [2015] EWHC 1773 (IPEC), a 29 June decision of Judge Richard Hacon in the increasingly impressive and cost-effective Intellectual Property Enterprise Court, England and Wales, is ...
Share via E–mail | Twitter | Facebook
Inventive step: is 'long felt want' still worth arguing? from patlit.blogspot.com VPG Systems UK Ltd v Air-Weigh Europe Ltd [2015] EWHC 1862 (IPEC), is a tidy little decision of Judge Richard Hacon, sitting in the Intellectual Property Enterprise Court, England and Wales, on 1 July, where ...
Share via E–mail | Twitter | Facebook
Friday fantasies from ipkitten.blogspot.com Good day for maple leaf growers? Well, maybe not quite, but the IPKat's friends at the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) have just told him in UPOV Notification 117 that Canada has ratified ... Share via E–mail | Twitter | Facebook
Implicit disclosure in prior art - a matter of fact? - "Coenzym Q10" from patlit.blogspot.com Skilled person reproducing the prior artAppeal proceedings in German nullity actions are limited to the examination of errors of law. The Supreme Court is therefore bound by the facts established by the court of first ...
Share via E–mail | Twitter | Facebook
Why Finland is not Silicon Valley: farewell Matti Makkonen, the "father of SMS" from ipkitten.blogspot.com We are a society that worships innovation and idolize those who commercially capitalize on it. Mark Zuckerberg, the late Steve Jobs, Sergey Brin and Larry Page are (or were) all larger than life personalities. Indeed ...
Share via E–mail | Twitter | Facebook
News from Abroad: Ariosa Diagnostics V Sequenom and Isis Innovation -- A European View from www.patentdocs.org By Paul Cole* -- The June 12, 2015 decision of the Federal Circuit in the above case has been discussed by Kevin Noonan in his posting of 22 June, but it is believed that the factual ...
Share via E–mail | Twitter | Facebook
Janet Freilich vs. Ted Sichelman on Patent Searching from writtendescription.blogspot.com Over at New Private Law Blog,
Janet Freilich and
Ted Sichelman are having a fun exchange about patent searches. Here's an excerpt from
Freilich's original post:
Since there is no easy way to ...
Share via E–mail | Twitter | Facebook
Constitutional Challenges to IPR Continue from patentlyo.com by Dennis Crouch Respect for property rights has always been a core American principle. That respect generally means that a government grant of a property rights cannot be cancelled or annulled outside of judicial action ...
Share via E–mail | Twitter | Facebook
What happens to the UPC if the UK leaves the EU? from patlit.blogspot.com From the most recent
Rouse newsletter comes some highly pertinent information and some thoughtful comment on a question that this blogger is frequently asked:
What will happen to the UPC [that's the Unified Patent ...
Share via E–mail | Twitter | Facebook
PLI Advanced Patent Prosecution Seminar from www.patentdocs.org Practising Law Institute (PLI) will be holding a two-day seminar entitled: "Advanced Patent Prosecution Seminar 2015: Claim Drafting & Amendment Writing" on July 16-17, 2015 in New York, NY, on August 10-11, 2015 in San Francisco ...
Share via E–mail | Twitter | Facebook
Webinar on Non-Obviousness Post-AIA from www.patentdocs.org Strafford will be offering a webinar/teleconference entitled "Section 103 and Non-Obviousness Post-AIA -- Navigating Timing Changes, Federal Court Treatment, and Secondary Considerations to Meet Patent Validity Requirements" on July 23, 2015 from 1:00 to ...
Share via E–mail | Twitter | Facebook