Patent & IP news for March 21, 2016

Patent Litigations

USPTO Weekly Stats

7,683
published
appl'ns
6,769
granted
patents
64
ptab
decisions

Patent & IP Blogs

African Tech Start-Ups Face Numerous Challenges from www.ip-watch.org

DAKAR, Senegal – Rachel Sibande won accolades when she started Malawi’s first ever technology start-up mHub in 2013. Her goal was to build young technology entrepreneurs through training, skills development and mentorship. As a computer ...

Share via E–mail | Twitter | Facebook

Supreme Court grants Samsung's petition to review Apple's smartphone design patents case from www.fosspatents.com

The Supreme Court of the United States has just published a decision it had already made on Friday (March 18): Samsung's December 2015 petition for writ of certiorari (request for Supreme Court review) in ...

Share via E–mail | Twitter | Facebook

Breast Prosthesis Patent Not Invalid Under 35 U.S.C. § 101 from docketreport.blogspot.com

The court denied defendant's motion to dismiss on the ground that plaintiff’s breast prosthesis patent encompassed unpatentable subject matter because the asserted claims were not directed toward an abstract idea. "While the process ...

Share via E–mail | Twitter | Facebook

Supreme Court Grants Cert on Design Patent Damages from patentlyo.com

By Jason Rantanen This morning, the Supreme Court granted certiorari on the design patent remedies question in Samsung Electronics Co. v. Apple Inc.  It did not grant certiorari on the functionality/ornamentality question raised in ...

Share via E–mail | Twitter | Facebook

Shining a Light on Obviousness from patentlyo.com

In re Cree (Fed. Cir. 2016)[1] In a straightforward decision, the Federal Circuit has affirmed the PTAB’s decision that Cree’s claimed down-shifted LED invention would have been obvious in light of a ...

Share via E–mail | Twitter | Facebook

The Supreme Court gets to visit an 1887 statute on damages for infringement of design patents in Samsung v. Apple from ipbiz.blogspot.com


The Supreme Court has granted cert on the design patent damages question presented in
Samsung v. Apple:

Where a design patent is applied to only a component of a product, should an award of infringer ...

Share via E–mail | Twitter | Facebook

The University of Central Florida invokes "trade secret" defense to information request from ipbiz.blogspot.com

The precipitating "event" was a hack of social security numbers of folks related to the University of Central Florida ["UCF"].

Then, Knight News made a request to determine "how much" a digital forensics firm was ...

Share via E–mail | Twitter | Facebook

Douglas Lichtman: Can Courts in Patent Litigation Slow Down? from writtendescription.blogspot.com

In a new essay, Patient Patents: Can certain types of patent litigation be beneficially delayed?, Douglas Lichtman makes a provocative and original argument. If, post-Ebay, injunctions are no longer available for patent infringement, then ...

Share via E–mail | Twitter | Facebook

Patentlyo Bits and Bytes by Anthony McCain from patentlyo.com

Joseph Herndon: Mitchell International v. Audatex North America Joseph Robinson & Robert Schaffer: Federal Circuit Remands Reexaminations Based On Erroneous Claim Constructions Eric Auchard and Dan Levine: German Court Ruling Threatens Apple’s Video Services Shamnad ...

Share via E–mail | Twitter | Facebook

What Would You Do For a KitKat Bar? from www.iposgoode.ca

Is there any chocolate bar more recognizable than the KitKat? Maybe, but that does not make it special according to the recent decision from the Court of Justice of the European Union (“CJEU”) in Société ...

Share via E–mail | Twitter | Facebook

Supreme Court Takes On Design Patent Damages from blawgit.com

Apple v. Samsung Apple applied for and received two design patents covering design elements on the front face of the Apple iPhone. Apple then successfully sued Samsung for infringement of these design patents. The jury ...

Share via E–mail | Twitter | Facebook

Shifting technological neutrality into reverse: UNPACK SODRAC from www.iposgoode.ca

Should all copies be treated the same way for the purposes of Copyright? If the CBC’s internal content management system creates incidental copies of audio works during the creation or broadcast of a television ...

Share via E–mail | Twitter | Facebook

Tariffbusters: Does the CBC v SODRAC decision debunk the “Mandatory Tariff Theory from www.iposgoode.ca

Introduction to the panel After two exciting and lively debates on the principle of technological neutrality (see Sebastian’s coverage here) and reproduction rights (see Paul Blizzard’s coverage here), IP Osgoode’s Unpack SODRAC ...

Share via E–mail | Twitter | Facebook

Sequenom Petitions Supreme Court for Review of Ariosa Decision from holmansbiotechipblog.blogspot.com


Sequenom today filed a Petition for Writ of Certiorari asking the Supreme Court to review Ariosa Diagnostics v. Sequenom, an important patent eligibility case described in previous posts (see for example).  If the Court grants ...

Share via E–mail | Twitter | Facebook

Sequenom: A great discovery should be worth something! from patentlyo.com

Sequenom v. Ariosa (on petition for writ of certiorari 2016) Sequenom’s petition for writ of certiorari argues that the Federal Circuit and the lower courts have “dangerously overextended Mayo” and its bar to patent ...

Share via E–mail | Twitter | Facebook

CAFC finds personal jurisdiction of defendant Mylan in Acorda/Ampyra case from ipbiz.blogspot.com

There are actually two cases. IPBiz is more interested in the
MS case involving Ampyra.

The bottom line:


The decisions of the district court that Mylan is
subject to specific personal jurisdiction in the district ...

Share via E–mail | Twitter | Facebook

Cree loses at CAFC on "white light emitter" LED patent 6,600,175 from ipbiz.blogspot.com

The decision of the Board in ex parte reexamination 90/010,940
of Cree’s U.S. Patent No. 6,600,175 was affirmed by the
CAFC. Cree loses.



The patent in suit, Cree’s ...

Share via E–mail | Twitter | Facebook

Some content © 2007–2016 RPX Corporation.
Terms of Service & Privacy Policy
For DMCA requests contact help@priorsmart.com.