Cannibalism, Branding and Market Segmentation from ipkitten.blogspot.com Recipe tips by HannibalTasting notes: To accompany this post on market segmentation and cannibalisation, the discriminating reader will enjoy fava beans* and a nice glass of chianti. Main course: IPKat has previously brought up marketing ...
Share via E–mail | Twitter | Facebook
Advocate General Szpunar considers Rubik's Cube shape mark invalid from ipkitten.blogspot.com The AmeriKat trying, and failing, to solve
a Rubik's cubeNever a fan of the Rubik's Cube (so hard to turn those sides with fuzzy paws), the AmeriKat missed Advocate General Szpunar's ...
Share via E–mail | Twitter | Facebook
Forthcoming Cuozzo Decision No Basis to Deny Stay Pending IPR from docketreport.blogspot.com The court granted defendant's motion to stay pending
inter partes review and rejected plaintiff's argument that the Supreme Court's pending review of a case supported plaintiff's argument of a lack of ...
Share via E–mail | Twitter | Facebook
Supreme Court Clarifies Copyright Attorney Fees: Reasonable Defense Not a Presumptive Excuse from patentlyo.com by Dennis Crouch In Kirtsaeng v. John Wiley & Sons (2016), the Supreme Court has vacated the Second Circuit’s ruling denying attorney-fee awards in the copyright case – but offered a balanced opinion that places a ...
Share via E–mail | Twitter | Facebook
Symantec acquires Blue Coat, a leading IPR filer with a $289M loss from ipcloseup.wordpress.com Cybersecurity firm Blue Coat Systems has decided to opt-out of an initial public offering and sell itself to software security leader Symantec for $4.65 billion. What has not been widely reported in the press ...
Share via E–mail | Twitter | Facebook
Supreme Court Patent Case of the Week: Philadelphia & Trenton R. Co. v. Stimpson from www.717madisonplace.com 39 U.S. 448 (1840)14 Pet. 448 THE PHILADELPHIA AND TRENTON RAILROAD COMPANY, PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR, vs. JAMES STIMPSON, DEFENDANT IN ERROR. Supreme Court of United States. 451*451 The case was argued by ...
Share via E–mail | Twitter | Facebook
Physically impossible, yes. But is it still obvious? from ipspotlight.com A recent Federal Circuit decision held that a patent directed to a tool attachment for demolition equipment was obvious in view of two prior art references. The court reached this conclusion even though it did ...
Share via E–mail | Twitter | Facebook
“Gist” or “Heart” of the Invention Oral Arguments from www.717madisonplace.com The Federal Circuit heard oral arguments in recent months where the “gist” or “heart” of the invention was discussed. The fact that appellants/appellees, district court judges, and Federal Circuit judges are now openly using ...
Share via E–mail | Twitter | Facebook
Led Zeppelin copyright case moves along from ipbiz.blogspot.com In
'Stairway to Heaven' trial: When does inspiration become plagiarism?, Lisa Suhay in the ChristianSM explores
the copyright case involving Led Zeppelin.
The suit is brought by the trustee of the estate of deceased guitarist ...
Share via E–mail | Twitter | Facebook
"There are no second acts" but there can be re-invention from ipbiz.blogspot.com Brian O'Neill of the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette makes some interesting comments on the Hamlet plagiarism matter in his post
titled
How plagiarism brings about job openings .
Mr. O'Neill's interesting article (which discusses, in ...
Share via E–mail | Twitter | Facebook
The legacy of game five of the 1961 World Series from ipbiz.blogspot.com In a post titled
THE MOST UNLIKELY PITCHERS TO CLINCH A WORLD SERIES , Paul Sullivan discusses Bud Daley in game five of the 1961 World Series.
As a few footnotes, Daley went from the Kansas ...
Share via E–mail | Twitter | Facebook