Patent & IP news for September 22, 2016

Patent Litigations

USPTO Weekly Stats

7,987
published
appl'ns
6,895
granted
patents
64
ptab
decisions

Patent & IP Blogs

post image AIPPI Congress Report 3: Biosimilars – similar but different? from ipkitten.blogspot.com

 
The general configuration AIPPI attendee's
saw the AmeriKat in during this year's Congress
While the AmeriKat was busy meeting with AIPPI's Standing Committee on the UPC (and boy did we have a ...

Share via E–mail | Twitter | Facebook

post image AIPPI Congress Report 4: Lawyers who lunch - role of experts in litigation and the EPO in the 21st Century from ipkitten.blogspot.com


The AmeriKat getting through her AIPPI lunch
(jet lag, definitely not content related....)
For attendees who just cannot get enough of legal intrigue at AIPPI's Congress
, learning and debate can, for a small fee ...

Share via E–mail | Twitter | Facebook

Iron Gate Security, Inc. v. Lowe's Companies, Inc. (S.D.N.Y. 2016) from www.patentdocs.org

By Michael Borella -- Iron Gate, holder of U.S. Patent No. 7,203,693, sued Lowe's in the Southern District of New York, alleging infringement. Lowe's moved to dismiss under Rule 12(b ...

Share via E–mail | Twitter | Facebook

European Cooperation Against Counterfeits Online: Sporting Goods Industry Joins Team from www.ip-watch.org

The Federation of the European Sporting Goods Industry (FESI) and the European Commission recently signed a memorandum of understanding that sets out to “establish a code of practice in the fight against the sale of ...

Share via E–mail | Twitter | Facebook

Nagoya Protocol Gains Members, Implications Spread Ripples from www.ip-watch.org

The UN Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) announced early this month that five new countries ratified its protocol on access and benefit sharing of genetic resources, bringing membership to 85 countries.

Share via E–mail | Twitter | Facebook

Shared Experiences Of Indigenous Peoples In The WIPO Negotiating Process from www.ip-watch.org

Members of indigenous communities this week shared their experiences in negotiating for their rights at the World Intellectual Property Organization and gave their advice on negotiations for potential treaties on genetic resources, traditional knowledge and ...

Share via E–mail | Twitter | Facebook

Willfulness Expert Excluded as Unhelpful to Jury from docketreport.blogspot.com

The court granted plaintiff's motion to exclude the testimony of defendants' expert regarding willfulness as unhelpful. "[The expert's] testimony on willfulness is not helpful to the jury, as it does not concern a ...

Share via E–mail | Twitter | Facebook

The English approach to obviousness - It all depends on the facts? from ipkitten.blogspot.com

One of the joys of blogging is that commenters, as well as alerting the hapless blogger to typographical errors and terminological infelicities, can alert to interesting aspects of a decision that did not seem striking ...

Share via E–mail | Twitter | Facebook

EU copyright reform – A leap forward or step back? from ipcloseup.com

Reforms to copyright law proposed last week by the European Commission would put the burden on Internet companies like Google, Facebook and YouTube to prevent online piracy and compensate content providers, like music companies and ...

Share via E–mail | Twitter | Facebook

CAFC affirms PTAB in Classco v. Apple: We find that those contentions do not show that the Board’s approach is inconsistent with KSR . from ipbiz.blogspot.com



From the decision:


Contrary to ClassCo’s argument, KSR does not require
that a combination only unite old elements without
changing their respective functions. KSR, 550 U.S. at
416. Instead, KSR teaches that “[a ...

Share via E–mail | Twitter | Facebook

Obviousness does not Require Prior Art to Fit Together Exactly from patentlyo.com

ClassCo v. Apple (Fed. Cir. 2016) In response to being sued for patent infringement, Apple filed for inter partes reexamination of ClassCo’s Patent No. 6,970,695. That litigation (originally filed in 2011) has ...

Share via E–mail | Twitter | Facebook

Yeda Research and Development Co. v. Abbott GmbH & Co. (Fed. Cir. 2016) from www.patentdocs.org

By Kevin E. Noonan -- Before the Supreme Court's recent forays into the topic of subject matter eligibility in patent law, the most contentious line of cases (from the Federal Circuit) concerned the written description ...

Share via E–mail | Twitter | Facebook

Some content © 2007–2016 RPX Corporation.
Terms of Service & Privacy Policy
For DMCA requests contact help@priorsmart.com.