Federal Circuit Relies on Non-Claim Construction Language in Markman Order in Affirming Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement from www.grayonclaims.com Impulse Tech. Ltd. v. Microsoft Corp. (Fed. Cir. Dec. 7, 2016) (nonprecedential)
This case concerned the construction of the term "defined physical space" in a patent directed to the use of three-dimensional motion tracking for ...
Share via E–mail | Twitter | Facebook
PPDs and standard disclosure - can you have your cake and eat it? from ipkitten.blogspot.com In the post-Brexit referendum world, is anyone else suffering from fatigue concerning the English proverb regarding the consumption of cake? This was even before a long lens photographer caught handwritten notes from a conservative MP ...
Share via E–mail | Twitter | Facebook
Know No Truth: Federal Circuit Reversal of Hearsay Ruling Saves Biofuel Patent from www.greenpatentblog.com REG Synthetic Fuels, LLC (REG) owns U.S. Patent No. 8,231,804, entitled “Even carbon number paraffin composition and method of manufacturing same” (‘804 Patent). The ‘804 Patent is directed to paraffin compositions containing ...
Share via E–mail | Twitter | Facebook
Guest Post -- The Emergent Microbiome: A Revolution for the Life Sciences -- Part IX, The Microbiome and Immunotherapy II from www.patentdocs.org By David Puleo* and Anthony D. Sabatelli** -- Given that the majority of the human microbiome is found in the gut, it is not surprising that most microbiome-based therapeutic approaches have been used to treat gastrointestinal ...
Share via E–mail | Twitter | Facebook
No Decision On WTO Plain Packaging Dispute Before May 2017 from www.ip-watch.org The much-awaited decision of the World Trade Organization Dispute Settlement Body on Australia’s law requiring that tobacco products be sold in plain packages, challenged by four countries, has been postponed and is now expected ...
Share via E–mail | Twitter | Facebook
Proposed EU Commission Copyright Reform Detrimental To Authors, CEIPI Says from www.ip-watch.org According to the Centre for International Intellectual Property Studies, the proposed European Commission copyright reform is detrimental to authors' interests, and contrary to the objective of creating a single digital market.
Share via E–mail | Twitter | Facebook
US High Court Muddies Rule On Design Patent Damages from www.ip-watch.org The United States Supreme Court yesterday provided a big victory for Samsung – and common sense, according to many experts. The high court ruled that Samsung need not pay $399 million in damages – all the company ...
Share via E–mail | Twitter | Facebook
Enfish is Not an Intervening Change of Law Sufficient to Amend Judgment of Invalidity Under 35 U.S.C. § 101 from docketreport.blogspot.com The court denied plaintiff's motion to amend an earlier judgment that the asserted claims of plaintiff's GPS patent were invalid for lack of patentable subject matter and rejected plaintiff's argument that
Enfish ... Share via E–mail | Twitter | Facebook
Oral argument in CRISPR interference on December 6, 2016 from ipbiz.blogspot.com The Scientist discussed the hearing of December 6, 2016 in the CRISPR interference battle.
Jeff Akst wrote
Just after 10:00 a.m., three USPTO judges entered and took their seats in front of the ... Share via E–mail | Twitter | Facebook
Recusal from www.717madisonplace.com If you were curious about the two-judge decision in Impulse Technology Ltd. v. Microsoft Corporation decided today, it appears that the Federal Circuit judge that recused herself was Judge Moore. From listening to the initial ...
Share via E–mail | Twitter | Facebook
UNAIDS Board Considers Recommendations On Access To Medicines from www.ip-watch.org The Board of the Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS) this week is considering a report calling for the 11 cosponsor agencies of the programme to follow the recommendations of the UN Secretary ...
Share via E–mail | Twitter | Facebook
CAFC vacates PTAB obviousness decision in Nuvasive [IPR2013- 00506. ]. A lack of articulation. from ipbiz.blogspot.com The conclusion of Nuvasive reads:
We have considered the parties’ remaining arguments
and find them unpersuasive. For these reasons, the Final
Written Decision of the U.S. Patent and Trademark
Office’s Patent and Trial ... Share via E–mail | Twitter | Facebook
What it takes to Prove a Motivation to Combine from patentlyo.com by Dennis Crouch In re NuVasive (Fed. Cir. 2016) In an important obviousness decision, the Federal Circuit has reversed the PTAB IPR decision – holding that the PTAB failed to sufficiently explain its ruling that a ...
Share via E–mail | Twitter | Facebook