They Invented What? (No. 35) from anticipatethis.wordpress.com Originally posted on
Anticipate This!™ | Patent and Trademark Law Blog:
U.S. Pat. No. 6,024,386: Aroma-generating greeting card. Background: This invention relates generally to greeting cards, and more particularly to a mailable card ...
Share via E–mail | Twitter | Facebook
Stockholm Administrative Court orders ISP to provide customers’ details to Swedish police from ipkitten.blogspot.com Over time Swedish internet service provider (ISP) Bahnhof has dismissed several requests for disclosure of customers’ data, making it a matter of principle to protect the privacy of its users .
However, in 2016 Bahnhof received ... Share via E–mail | Twitter | Facebook
Dealing with choices in disease treatment from ipbiz.blogspot.com Back in law school, I wrote a column for the University of Chicago Phoenix on the "Let's Make a Deal" problem of accepting Monty Hall's offer to switch doors. The correct answer is ...
Share via E–mail | Twitter | Facebook
Do We Need A Global Body To Set Priorities For Diseases And Research? from www.ip-watch.org A recent panel of health experts gathered at the hallowed Swiss Intellectual Property Institute in Bern (which counts Albert Einstein among its alumni) tackled some of the toughest questions facing global health policymakers with an ...
Share via E–mail | Twitter | Facebook
Innovations For All: Swiss-Led Panel Looks At What Works, What Doesn’t from www.ip-watch.org The current innovation system has yielded many important innovations and extended human life, nobody disputes this. But what about the cases where it hasn’t and a problem persists? A panel of health experts organised ...
Share via E–mail | Twitter | Facebook
Serving Responses to Contention Interrogatories Near Close of Fact Discovery Justifies Monetary Sanctions Against Defendant and Counsel from docketreport.blogspot.com The court granted plaintiff's motion for monetary sanctions against defendant and its counsel following plaintiff's successful motion to compel further contention interrogatory responses because defendant's behavior was not substantially justified. "[Defendant] now ...
Share via E–mail | Twitter | Facebook