Investment disputes, trademarks and licenses, and ICSID tribunals-"Bridgestone v. Panama" from ipkitten.blogspot.com Kat friend Simon Klopschinski, of rospatt osten pross, has kept IPKat readers up-to-date on major developments in arbitration law as they apply to IP. Below he discusses an important recent result in this regard, Bridgestone ... Share via E–mail | Twitter | Facebook
Around the IP blogs! from ipkitten.blogspot.com IPKat is here with your weekly round up of the goings-on around the IP blogosphere. This week's highlights include the Dutch equivalent of Actavis v ICOS (Tadalafil), a US ruling on patent eligible ... Share via E–mail | Twitter | Facebook
Unworkable Interplay Between Court and PTO Proceedings Requires Stay of Litigation from docketreport.blogspot.com The court
sua sponte stayed plaintiff's patent infringement action pending
ex parte reexamination to conserve judicial resources. "[H]appening essentially in real time, there are accusations of perjury being submitted to the PTO based ...
Share via E–mail | Twitter | Facebook
New Draft Text On Final Day Of WIPO Committee On Genetic Resources; Expert Group Proposed from www.ip-watch.org After the first suggested revision of potential treaty articles preventing the misappropriation of genetic resources was sent back to the drawing board this week, the second revision emerged today, for consideration by the World Intellectual ...
Share via E–mail | Twitter | Facebook
The Political Economy of Hatch-Waxman from patentlyo.com My colleague, Professor Erika Lietzan (Missouri) has released a really interesting and thorough article walking through the history of the Hatch-Waxman legislation process beginning with some proposals in the 1970s through its passage in 1984 ...
Share via E–mail | Twitter | Facebook
En banc oral argument of Federal Education Association v. Defense from www.717madisonplace.com The Federal Circuit has now posted the second en banc oral argument that it heard on March 8, 2018, Federal Education Association v. Defense. While this is not a patent case, en banc arguments can ...
Share via E–mail | Twitter | Facebook
Supreme Court Oral Argument of Upper Skagit Tribe v. Lundgren from www.717madisonplace.com The Supreme Court of the United States heard oral argument this week in Upper Skagit Tribe v. Lundgren. The issue presented is: Whether a court’s exercise of in rem jurisdiction overcomes the jurisdictional bar ...
Share via E–mail | Twitter | Facebook
Article Suggestion: Long-arm jurisdiction for foreign patent owners from www.717madisonplace.com 35 U.S.C. §293 is a long-arm statute that applies to non-resident owners of patents. Historically, it allowed non-resident patent owners to be sued in D.C. District Court; however, that was revised to ...
Share via E–mail | Twitter | Facebook